🔗 Share this article

Former President Donald Trump has repeatedly expressed his desire to see critics investigated, exerting pressure on the DOJ to prosecute former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

"We can't delay further, it's killing our standing and trustworthiness," the president wrote last month in a social media message.

"I was impeached twice, and indicted me (5 times!)" he said, mentioning the four criminal cases he faced after leaving the White House in 2021 and James's civil case.

Each have subsequently been charged, in cases that many experts have stated seem to be politically motivated and difficult to succeed in legal proceedings.

But the latest charges against a Trump critic, ex national security adviser John Bolton, differ significantly, legal experts and ex-prosecutors assert.

"I would say, comparing Bolton's charges to James' is like equating two different things," stated Mark Lesko, a former acting US attorney for the Eastern District of New York.

This Details of the Case

Bolton has been criminally indicted on federal charges pertaining to the supposed mishandling of classified information. Since departing the White House in 2019, he has emerged as a vocal presidential opponent, even to describe him "stunningly uninformed" and unfit for office in his book.

Specialists contend that while there may be political motivations to target Bolton, the methods used to secure an indictment and the evidence gathered against him suggest a potentially stronger legal argument than the DOJ brought against James.

"These actions that's being claimed is simultaneously more serious and seems to have taken place over a considerable period of time," commented Carissa Byrne Hessick, a academic at the University of North Carolina School of Law.

Throughout his time as Trump's national security adviser, and following his 2019 White House departure, prosecutors alleged that Bolton put the nation at risk by improperly retaining and transmitting classified information to relatives using insecure means, including AOL. Several of the documents were marked top secret.

The indictment alleges that at one point a hacker accessed to Bolton's account where documents were kept and transmitted an seeming threat to cause "the biggest controversy since Hillary [Clinton]'s emails were released".

Bolton entered a not guilty plea during a hearing on Friday to eighteen separate charges of mishandling sensitive materials.

Retribution or a Strong Case?

The schedule of his charge - coming on the heels of allegations against Comey - has revived concerns about external influence on the justice system.

Trump previously implied Bolton should be in jail, and described him a "disreputable person". Bolton, for his part, wrote a book about his experience in the Trump administration that was highly critical of the leader.

"There's no question that the timing of this charge, when paired with others, has raised doubts about the validity of these allegations, and why these counts are being brought now," stated Jamil Jaffer, creator and executive director of the National Security Institute.

However, he continued, "should the Justice Department is capable to demonstrate the facts stated and show the material is properly classified, his behavior may certainly have violated the statute".

Prosecuting such a high-ranking figure for improperly handling classified documents is "uncommon" but not unprecedented, noted Carrie Cordero, a expert at the Center for a New American Security.

"Cases that involve sensitive materials pose challenges to try, but they can and are filed against equally junior and senior officials, from occasionally," she said.

Similarities to Examinations into Trump and President

Trump likewise encountered charges of improperly storing classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida and hindering their return, but that case was ultimately thrown out by a federal judge and negated by his return as leader.

A independent investigator additionally determined that former President Joe Biden improperly stored classified documents from his period as vice president, but did not prosecute him.

Bolton's situation shares characteristics to Trump's sensitive materials matters, said Mr Lesko, who previously held a senior security role at the DOJ.

Strict protocols regulate the handling of classified documents. To secure a conviction, the government must prove that Bolton knew the material he was transmitting was classified, and he had to knowingly transfer it to someone without authorization to obtain it.

"Because of the sensitive character of the information at issue in this matter, we don't have a great deal of particulars about why the government contends elements like the diary entries and the additional information he communicated by email, and why there were restricted," explained Mr Jaffer.

A More Traditional Legal Action

The process by which the DOJ brought this case will be closely examined, after Trump openly posted his wish to see his political opponents charged and several of those charges materialized.

But Mr Lesko indicated in Bolton's case, authorities seem to have followed protocol.

"The Bolton prosecution and ultimately the indictment appeared to have observed the regular procedure including the regulations and standards within the DOJ," he said.

In contrast to Comey's brief, concise indictment, Bolton's was a increasingly "conventional" document that "explicitly sets forth the details involving the circumstances and circumstances in this instance," Mr Lesko commented.

"It seems reasonably aligned with a series of precedents... where government officials improperly handled and shared sensitive information."